The government is now operating in accordance with the Guidance on Caretaker Conventions, pending the outcome of the 2025 federal election.

Food Regulation Policy Framework

This framework sets out the process for identifying and assessing a potential food regulatory issue and deciding the appropriate policy response.

We aim to provide documents in an accessible format. If you're having problems using a document with your accessibility tools, please contact us for help.

Publication type:
Strategy or framework
Date of official publication:
Description:

 

In Step A, the authorising environment requires clear scope, objectives and permission. It includes risk analysis – the use of risk tools to assess the priority and ensure the case for action is made.

After Step A, there is equal time investment in:

  • policy initiation (steps B and C) – a third of effort and time will focus on understanding the issue and developing a case
  • policy development and evidence (steps D, E and F) – a third of focus and time on outcomes, opinions and recommendation/advice
  • evaluation and review (steps G, H and I) – a third of effort and time on implementation and evaluating the effectiveness of the policy.

Step B (understand the issue):

  • Does the risk affect more than one jurisdiction?
  • Analysis and assessment
  • Is the case made?

Step C is Gateway 1. The options are:

  • agreed priority for bi-national response –goes to the next step
  • no further action
  • jurisdictional response.

In Step D (describe the desired outcome), define success and intent.

In Step E (develop and evaluate options), the options are:

  • no action
  • not regulatory
  • regulatory
  • exploring, designing and testing – consider outcomes.

The full range of regulatory and non-regulatory and government or industry initiated options need to be explored in Step E, including:

  • education
  • partnering
  • communication and information
  • voluntary industry standards
  • industry codes of practice
  • incentive programs
  • co-regulatory arrangements
  • industry-driven alternative solutions
  • development of food standards.

In Step F (policy advice), there is a recommendation and policy advice to ministers.

Step G is Gateway 2 – go or no go. 

In Step H (build and implement), put in place the selected option. 

In Step I (evaluation of effectiveness of policy), results will feed back into the policy strategy to reinforce why the issue required development.

This process (steps B to I) is flexible to facilitate back and to ensure issues are assessed adequately. A decision to discontinue the process can be made at any point.

Steps J and H occur throughout steps B to I. In Step J (communicate and engage):

  • engage stakeholders
  • listen to feedback
  • consider partnering
  • communicate on status
  • consider implementation early.

In Step K (data, information and evidence):

  • conduct an environment scan
  • give stakeholders access to all data
  • keep a central catalogue of known available data and potential source
  • explore trusted partnerships
  • use a range of risk tools with varying criteria throughout the process
  • use the information and evidence to better inform risk analysis.
Date last updated: